Police and comedian have difficulty finding places.

Picture of Lost Cat Poster

In my previous post I argued that we have a problem with addresses. Michale McIntyre puts the same argument in a much more entertaining way.

The Police in the UK are fully aware of the problem explained by Michael McIntyre and have proposed to people the use What 3 Words. when people need their assistance. While I salut this initiative of the Police to help find places. It might be a more useful system to use than Open Location Code (OLC) which I argued for in my previous posts.

I still think OLC is a better system for building an addressing system. However, in an emergency situation saying three words down the telephone is easier than saying a string of letters and numbers. Horses for courses as the British say. However, Google maps is on every phone nearly while W3W is not. So it may be more productive for the police and emergency services to promote the use of OLC.

What do you think is the better system for emergency use considering the arguments above?

In the next post I will talk about other problems the use of OLC may create if used as an addressing system.

Why do we need addressing to be solved?

Governments in developing countries do not have the ability to register students/voters/patients accurately for lack of consistent addresses, the same goes for other government and commercial organisations. The lack of backbone information infrastructure is rooted in a lack of maps and addresses which hampers planning and evidence-based decision making. Natural disasters are a prime example of this lack of basic planning tools. Open Street mapping     and https://mapaction.org are responses to  the need for mapping  information management as soon as disaster strikes. QZ Africa chronicles how Poor data hurts African countries’ ability to make good policy decisions.

The traditional way for mapping as prescribed by the ISO Standard and the recommendation of the World Bank for Street Addressing and the Management of Cities will mean an address naming project for a country which will take over 10 years at a huge cost; regardless of mitigating actions and devolved authority to local action. The emirates of Abu Dhabi launched an addressing initiative in 2012 to finish in 2014 https://onwani.abudhabi.ae with traditional addressing approach and QR codes attached. Onwani in the webaddress simply means my address in Arabic. In 2019 the Emirates municipalities are still allocating funds to finish the work, naming roads and putting up signes and numbers. An app was created to facilitate the use of this system “Onwani click” in your nearest app store. Ministries hold workshops for logistical firms to introduce them to the addressing system. This is in an emirate that is less than 3 million people and $130,000 GDP per person. Imagine doing this in Nigeria.

The biggest drawback of this approach is the lack of utility in the intervening years and the diminishing rate of return on investment.

The process of naming every street and issuing a numbering system for each street will take a very long time and cost a lot of money without providing immediate relief or utility. A significant drawback to this approach is the lag time between areas with named streets and numbers which are prone to mistakes, going out of date quickly, and suffer from ambiguity that all traditional addressing suffers from. For example;

A post code, PE33 9QL in rural Cambridgeshire provides no help to a postman or to delivery services. While a six characters ‘HG66+H7,’ King’s Lynn is specific to 13 meters for a building at the end of dirt track. The actual location of a building, with this address ‘School Ln, end of River Drove, Stoke Ferry, King’s Lynn PE33 9QL,’ is 500 meters away from the postcode center as the crow flies and 1700m along the road. This is in Britain who has been mapping and addressing for over 200 years, what chance developing countries have?

I grew up in a country where there are some street names, and in some cases numbers, but nobody uses them. The simple reason for this is the time lag between new roads and buildings made and the official naming and numbering happening simultaneously. This demonstrates another example of the lack of a solution with traditional addressing.

So, what are the properties we need in an address, derived from the lessons learnt in the above examples:

  • Utility: Address can be used as a unique identifier for a building or a place, now. Allowing organisations to consistently attach information to that place, for example, voters, patients, students, utility bills, shipping address and so on.
  • Easily Discoverable: The last thing you need is to spend €27m in a small country like Ireland to let people know what their postcode is!
  • A local app is not necessary to find addresses in your locality.
  • Machine readable when hand written on an envelop.

Just after I finished writing this article I became aware of a company which is trying to create addressing within their own city in Libya https://misrata.onwan.ly. It provides a local system that will work for them for lack of a universally  adopted system. This is akin to the addressing System of Abu Dhabi reliant on a number, local mapping application and a QR code. QR code can not be had written.

Open Location Code have the characteristics of a global easy to adopt system which we need to start building a different kind of world. As the pandemic “has been likened to an X-ray, revealing fractures in the fragile skeleton of the societies we have built”. UN Secretary General Guterres. We cannot afford not to do so.

I discover now that the Open Street Maps community proposed the adoption of OLC January 2019. A step in the right direction if implemented and an example to other mapping oranisations.

Intelligent Adderssing and Mapping

Proposition

Addressing systems are essential for the management of modern economies and the assurance of data collection to base economic investment on intelligence gained from data. Traditional addressing systems, assigning addresses through the use of a number road name, district city and administrative area, have been employed for the last couple of hundred years. However these old systems are have several disadvantages with lack of complete coverage even in places like and importantly take decades to implement and often are never completed.

We propose a novel addressing system by combining state of the art technologies. This Intelligent Addressing and Mapping (IAM) approach assigns unique digital identifier to each building and land parcel. The IAM system is compatible with some and all modern mapping systems, such as car satellite navigation, and behaves as an address and as a postcode at the same time. The IAM system adheres to the UNDP and World Bank proposed standards for a practical Land Administration. IAM while modern and futuristic through the provision of unique identifiers also allows the basis of traditional addressing to take shape and develop.

By using IAM unique digital identifiers will allow citizens and the State to find their addresses online or through the use of an app on their smart phone. A digital map of buildings and land parcels will allow the State to organise their resources for Land Administration, economic growth and development as a well as for security.

This presents a futuristic strategy to secure the benefits of addressing, in a relative short period of time, generating unique addresses, way finding, and navigation, while at the same time creating data for Land Administration in advance of the UN 2030 target date for sustainable development. Setting up the digital infrastructure of Nigeria will provide the right conditions for investment and sustainable development of the economy and place developing countries who adopt the system at the forefront of all developing countries and on a par with European countries. Our approach can deliver a digital addressing system with a rapid streamlined implementation within 5 years.